Category Archives: Training ideas

Posts summarising ideas for how to simplify initial teacher training courses (such as Cambridge CELTA, Trinity CertTESOL etc.)

What makes a lesson GREAT? Part #4

Here is the much-delayed part four in a five-part series of posts inspired by Mike Harrison, who asked on the IATEFL Facebook page “what makes a lesson GREAT?” My answer was:

Group Dynamic

Relevance to learners’ lives

Emergent language

Attentiveness

Thoughtfulness

You can find my posts on the first three characteristics by clicking on them above. Or you can start in medias res by reading on…

A for Attentiveness

The now-traditional glance in my dictionary tells me this about attentiveness:

attentive |əˈtɛntɪv|

adjective

paying close attention to something : never before had she had such an attentive audience | Congress should be more attentive to the interests of taxpayers.

ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French attentif, -ive, from atendre ‘give one’s attention to’ (see attend ).

Attentiveness is then, the paying of attention to something. Seems obvious, but there are one or two implications worth paying attention to! For instance, paying attention is a conscious, deliberate act, and the collocation pay is more than coincidental.

The capacity to pay attention – or focus – on something is cognitively limited and it comes with an opportunity cost: humans are not omniscient – we have to make attentional sacrifices.

These sacrifices for learners may come in the form of error, memory failure, tiredness. As teachers, it is worth being attentive to the shifts in dynamic which may arise from the impacts of our learners paying attention to something new in class.

Here is a simple piece of homework for you:

TASK

In coming lessons, practise slowing down any instructions you give or transitions you make by counting to to three after each part of the instruction or transitional talk. In this three seconds, work on using eye contact to gather your learners’ attention. Try to use silence and stillness to marshall their attention instead of volume and movement. Here is an example of what I mean…

Ok everyone, you came up with some great ideas in that last task (3 second pause; look at learners)

Now, let’s use those ideas to make something (3 second pause; look at learners)

Look here (indicate section of coursebook containing next task; pause three seconds; check learners are looking at what teacher is pointing at)

etc…

This is aimed at training an attentive, deliberate approach to gathering your learners’ attention in preparation for new tasks. In the cut and thrust of a class, it is not uncommon for us to feel under time pressure and try to work more quickly than our learners may be able to follow; slowing down transitions like this may actually lead to gaining learner attention more effectively and thereby enabling them to get to work more quickly.

Paying attention to attention

Attention as a concept is also worth attending to briefly. Here are some excerpts from its dictionary definition:

attention |əˈtɛnʃ(ə)n|

noun

1 notice taken of someone or something; the regarding of someone or something as interesting or important : he drew attention to three spelling mistakes | you’ve never paid that much attention to her opinions.

What catches my attention here is that attention is linked to interest or a sense of importance. We pay attention to what seems interesting or useful for us. This relates to my earlier post in this series about relevance to learner lives. Paying attention is selectively ignoring other, competing stimuli in the environment in order to focus on something that we have deemed worth our attention.

The pedagogic implications of this for lesson content selection should be obvious – if we expect learners to pay attention to what goes on in our lessons, we had better make sure that what’s going on is interesting or important for the people in the room. To do this successfully, we need to be making the content of our lessons more worthy of their attention than anything else in the competing environment.

But how can we best manage this given that what is interesting or important may change on a daily basis for the people in the room, while the content of any given syllabus is prescribed months if not years in advance?

Scott Thornbury has just been discussing the limitations of such “bulldozing” of content; to take his evocative flock of starlings metaphor (read his excellent post to see what I am talking about), if we as teachers use buckshot instead of birdseed to get our learners’ attention, we are onto a loser.

All we will succeed in doing is scattering their attention even further, instead of focusing their attention on something that will generate a feeding – or learning – frenzy.

Easily said, but how can we as teachers pick the right kind of birdseed? To stretch the metaphor to breaking point, I would suggest we should pay close attention ourselves to the topics and language that our learners start pecking at, in class and outside of it. To help promote and develop this habit, here is a little homework:

TASK

Over the next week, keep a notepad handy and note down at least 2 examples of the following for each of the learners in a chosen class:

1) pieces of language that they ask for clarification about while engaged in talk with classmates not involving a teacher-specified task

2) topics of conversation that they use to initiate or extend conversation with classmates or you, the teacher.

The language that the learner uses is not important for our purposes here – if you do not share their L1, and you suspect that something interesting or important is going on in their conversation, ask them to paraphrase in English in the break.

I hope that after this small piece of data-gathering, you will have an increased sense of what kinds of things catch your students’ attention, and then you should be in a better position to leverage it in future. If you do this experiment, please let me know what you learn, and how you manage to exploit it!

Dear Diary…

Journal page image

Well, you've got to start somewhere...

On our CELTA courses up to now, we have maintained an approach to finding out what our trainees thought about their teaching that is fairly typical of such courses: we ask them to write a self-evaluation after they have taught, which they submit to us before we sit down with them to discuss the lesson.

This has several purposes and virtues: the trainee has an opportunity to reflect on the experience and work it through on their own terms; this in turn allows us the chance to see what the trainee is thinking (and, possibly, what they aren’t yet thinking about); it provides documentary evidence of the trainee’s capacity for self-reflection which is then amenable to evaluation.

“Remember, this is for posterity, so please, be honest: how do you feel?”

Earlier, we provided a fairly typical pro-forma document which contained questions for the trainees to respond to.  There were questions like how far do you think you met your aims?  Did anything in the lesson surprise you?  If you were to teach this lesson again, is there anything you would change?  What would you like your tutor’s opinion about regarding this lesson?

Over time, we started to feel this was not giving us the kind of information we wanted.  Quite apart from the odd case where we got single-word responses of the yes…no…nothing…not really variety, I started to feel that form-filling was not by its very nature conducive to reflection.

“Love letters straight/from your heart…”

So someone had the idea of just asking trainees to write their tutor a letter after the lesson.  We started to get (I think) much more interesting and considered responses.  Trainees were more candid, but also more discursive.  They asked questions.  They cracked jokes.  Sometimes they cried for help.  Of course, this had got through using the pro-forma, but we felt letters allowed for more of it.

A recent visiting assessor confirmed this feeling, adding that he felt the letter approach allowed for a much clearer view of the trainee’s reflective capacity and it revealed more of their personality into the bargain.  It’s always a relief to hear that something you are doing (or, in this case, asking someone else to do) is actually working.

So you might be surprised now to hear that on our next course, we are ditching the letter writing idea.

Goin’ Old School…

Then again, if you have been following discussions on this blog, you’ll already be aware that journal-keeping had caught my interest.  So finally we have gotten round to breaking the old routine once more.

I’ve bought a stockpile of really old-school exercise books (just like you probably had at school) and we are going to ask the trainees to keep a journal.  Instead of just writing something expressly for reflection on days they taught about their own lessons, we want them to write for at least 15 minutes each evening about anything related to their experience on the course up to that point.  It’s likely that on days they taught, this will predominate their reflections, but we will also hopefully get insights into their approach to planning, what they are noticing through observation and what they are picking up and toying with from our group sessions.

The idea of using journals is nothing new – it is fairly common on in-service courses like DELTA and I believe it is also common on Trinity College London  CertTESOL courses.  But it is new to us, so we hope to learn something from it.

Quid Pro Quo

We tutors are also planning to keep journals ourselves and make them available to our trainees, just as we will have access to theirs.  Fair’s fair, after all.

So what I would like to know from anyone reading this is: what are your experiences with journal-keeping, especially in a pre-service context?  Do you have any useful reading references on the subject?

Blast from the Past! – new old article

Just posted another old (or should that be ‘vintage’?) article of mine that I dug up.  Re-reading it wasn’t too embarrassing so I thought I’d share.

I can see lots of connections to now: the ideas about learner independence explain why Howard Vickers’ talk at the Dogme Symposium resonates so much with me, and the focus on exploring learner language chimes with my emergent, unplugged leanings – so an interesting piece of nostalgia for me, but hopefully a useful read for some of you!  Here’s the link: http://teachertrainingunplugged.wordpress.com/other-writing/just-for-the-record/

Please let me know if you find it was worth reading!

Anthony

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 774 other followers